AIcruiters vs Loxo: which one does your recruitment team need?

Loxo describes itself as a Talent Intelligence Platform that “unifies sourcing, CRM, ATS, outreach and AI Agents into one system of record”. In practice it is one product in which a recruitment firm keeps its jobs, candidates, clients, pipelines and activity history, and from which it also finds and contacts people.

Its sourcing module, Loxo Source, searches your own database together with what Loxo calls a global talent dataset of more than 850 million professionals. Outreach runs as multi-stage email and SMS sequences, with calls and meetings in the same place. Loxo also lists a set of AI agents, among them sourcing agents for longlists and shortlists, a contact info finding agent, a candidate submittal agent, a job description agent and an AI notetaker.

Its solution pages address recruiting firms, executive search, staffing agencies, RPO and in-house teams. The pricing page shows three tiers: Core and Professional start at $149 and $199 per user per month, billed annually, and Enterprise is a custom annual agreement (per 17 September 2026, subject to change). Loxo Source and a monthly credit allowance per user are part of Professional.

Choose AIcruiters when you are keeping your ATS and the bottleneck is the hours recruiters lose to searching, screening and writing messages.

• You already run an ATS or CRM that works, and replacing it would be a migration project you do not need.
• Your candidates are found and respond on LinkedIn, and you pay for one or more Recruiter seats. See AIcruiters vs LinkedIn Recruiter.
• Every shortlist has to be explainable to a hiring manager or client.
• Nobody may be contacted in your name without the approval rules your team has set.
• You recruit in the Netherlands or elsewhere in the EU and want Dutch-language outreach from a partner who knows agency work.
• You want the investment tied to cost you can take out, rather than to user count.