Sourcing savings calculator
Enter your LinkedIn Recruiter seats and the FTE your team spends on sourcing. The calculator estimates the annual saving on seats and capacity, subtracts the AIcruiters investment of 30% of that saving and shows your net annual saving. It is an indication based on five visible assumptions, not a quote.
Two numbers. One indicative saving.
Move both sliders to your situation. Open the assumptions to see exactly how the result is calculated, or read how the business case works.
Calculate your sourcing savings
Adjust two numbers to see your potential annual saving.
Start here. Drag both sliders.
Move a sliderto see your indicative saving
- Saved on LinkedIn Recruiter seats
- €0
- Saved on manual sourcing capacity
- €0
- AIcruiters investment
- −€0
- Net annual saving
- €0
View calculation assumptions
- Annual cost per LinkedIn Recruiter seat
- €10,000
- Fully loaded annual cost per sourcing FTE
- €75,000
- LinkedIn seats AIcruiters can replace
- 80%
- Sourcing FTE capacity AIcruiters can replace
- 60%
- AIcruiters investment
- 30% of total sourcing savings
Indicative estimate only. Your exact business case depends on your real contracts, team structure and sourcing operation.
We’ll calculate this using your real costs, team structure and sourcing operation.
How to get a useful estimate.
- 01
Count seats in use
Use the LinkedIn Recruiter seats your team actually pays for today, not the ones you plan to add.
- 02
Count sourcing time honestly
Add up the time spent searching, screening and writing outreach. Two recruiters who each source half the week count as 1 FTE.
- 03
Compare scenarios
Slide up for next year's hiring plan. The difference shows how seat costs grow with headcount.
What the calculator includes, and what it leaves out.
It includes the two costs that grow with every recruiter you add: seat licences and the manual hours behind sourcing. Seats are valued at €10,000 per year and a sourcing FTE at €75,000 per year, fully loaded. AIcruiters is assumed to replace 80% of seat usage and 60% of sourcing capacity.
It leaves out what differs per team: your real contract prices, job board spend, agency fees and the value of filling roles faster. So the result is indicative. For the seat side, see what LinkedIn Recruiter costs. For the time side, compare AI sourcing with manual sourcing.
Calculator questions.
Is the result a quote?
No. It is an estimate based on default assumptions. The exact business case depends on your contracts, team structure and sourcing operation, and we calculate it with your real numbers.
Why is the investment a percentage of the saving?
Because the value of AIcruiters comes from the seats and sourcing capacity it replaces. The investment follows that saving instead of a price per seat.
Why not replace 100% of sourcing capacity?
Recruiters keep judgement, candidate conversations and hiring decisions, and review uncertain cases. See how the platform splits the work between agent and recruiter.
Is it relevant with only one Recruiter seat?
Yes. AIcruiters can already create value when one expensive seat or recurring manual sourcing workload can be reduced. The business case becomes stronger as volume increases.
Replace the assumptions with your own numbers.
In a 30-minute demo we run AIcruiters on one of your vacancies and build the business case with your real seat costs and sourcing capacity.