Step 1 · Vacancy intelligence

Turn a vacancy into a precise sourcing brief

Vacancy intelligence is the first step of the AIcruiters workflow. The agent reads the vacancy, separates hard requirements from preferences, and maps the job titles, industries, skills and career paths where suitable candidates are likely to be found. The result is a search strategy your recruiter can check and adjust before the market search starts.

A flat lay of paper, black and orange blocks with a magnifying glass: a vacancy broken into search signals.

What does the agent extract from a vacancy?

The agent structures the vacancy into groups of search signals. Each group is visible, so a recruiter can see exactly what the search will be based on.

  • Hard requirements: criteria a candidate must meet, such as years in a stack, a registration or a permit
  • Preferences: things that strengthen a match but should not exclude anyone
  • Titles: the official title plus the variants people actually use on their profiles
  • Industries: sectors where the same work is done under a different name
  • Career paths: the roles people typically hold before this one

How does it separate must-haves from nice-to-haves?

The agent looks at how requirements are phrased and where they sit. 'You have at least five years of experience with' reads differently from 'experience with X is a plus'. Because the split is written down, internal contradictions, such as a junior salary band combined with a senior list of requirements, become visible for the recruiter to resolve instead of being guessed away.

This split matters because it drives two later steps. Hard requirements shape which profiles enter the long list during AI candidate sourcing. Preferences shape the order during candidate ranking, without silently shrinking the market. A vacancy with ten must-haves usually has three real ones; the other seven belong in the ranking, not in the filter.

Patterns a structured brief makes visible

These are the issues recruiters often catch in an intake call. With the requirements split out before the search, they are easier to spot, so the conversation with the hiring manager starts from specifics.

  • Wish lists: more hard requirements than the market can plausibly meet
  • Missing practical criteria: location, hybrid days, language, permit or driving licence
  • Title inflation: a 'lead' title with no leadership tasks in the description
  • Tool lock-in: a specific tool demanded where equivalent experience would do

What changes compared with a manual intake?

A good recruiter does all of this. Here the result is written down and consistent across the team.

Part of the brief
Manual intake
With vacancy intelligence
Requirements
Copied from the vacancy text
Split into hard requirements and preferences, visible for review
Job titles
The titles the recruiter happens to know
Official title plus variants and adjacent titles, visible for review
Where to look
Usually the same industry as the employer
Adjacent industries and career paths that lead to the role
Search input
One Boolean string per recruiter
Several search routes built from the same signals
Knowledge retention
In the recruiter's head
Written down and visible to the whole team

What does the recruiter review, and when?

The output of this step is a search strategy, not a list of people. That makes it the cheapest moment to correct course. A sensible setup is an approval rule here for new clients or unusual roles: the recruiter checks the requirement split, removes a title that leads to the wrong audience or adds an industry the agent did not consider. For recurring profiles the strategy can run without approval once it has proven itself.

When a search returns too few relevant profiles, the recruiter usually does not need to rewrite the vacancy. They move a requirement from hard to preference, widen a career path or accept a longer commute. How approval points are set is explained on the human-in-the-loop page.

Where does vacancy intelligence stop?

It does not decide what the job should be. If a hiring manager insists on a requirement, it stays a requirement. The agent does not rewrite your published vacancy text, set a salary or judge whether a role is realistic to fill; it makes assumptions visible so people can decide.

It also does not replace your knowledge of the client or team. Culture, the manager's style and the real reason a previous hire left are things a recruiter adds. If you still build searches by hand, our Boolean search guide shows how the same signals translate into search strings.

Questions about vacancy intelligence

Does it work for niche or senior roles?

Yes, and that is where a structured brief helps most, because the number of suitable titles and paths is small and easy to miss. For executive and niche roles it makes sense to keep an approval step on the search strategy.

What input does the agent need?

A vacancy text is enough to start. Intake notes, the hiring manager's must-haves or examples of good past hires make the strategy sharper.

Does it work for Dutch vacancies?

AIcruiters works in English and Dutch, so a Dutch vacancy is analysed in Dutch and the titles include the variants people use in the Dutch market.

What if the strategy is wrong?

Then you correct it before anything is searched. Move a requirement, remove a title or add an industry. An approval point on this step makes sense for new roles.

Does the agent change our vacancy text?

No. It reads the vacancy to build a search strategy. The published text stays as it is.

Last updated:

See how your own vacancy breaks down

Bring a live vacancy to the demo. You see the search strategy the agent builds from it, and which requirements are worth checking with your hiring manager.